• Home
  • About
  • #SAchat
    • About #SAchat
    • #SAchat Archives
    • #SAchat Awards
  • More
    • Leadership Team
    • Be a Writer
    • SA Directory
  • #SAReads

What’s Your Innovation Type?


Posted by Gary Alan Miller on 04 Jul 2012 / 11 Comments



There has been conversation here on the SA Collaborative Blog and in other places about “radical practitioners” and innovation in the student affairs space.  The dialogs have been spirited and thought provoking.  But, I think we’ve missed exploring more deeply at least one piece of the conversation, and that is that there isn’t just one way to be innovative or only one type of innovator.  There are a lot of books and articles that discuss types of innovators.  But, my go-to guide on the subject is Ten Faces of Innovation by Tom Kelley at IDEO (in fact, I might be just a little too into the book, because I’ve developed a self-assessment tool around the types he presents!).

In this blog I want to give a quick overview of the ten types and why recognizing that different types exist (even if you don’t agree with this specific list) is an important step in being able to involve others, or maybe involve yourself if you don’t think you’re an innovator, in this conversation.

A quick note that below I’m going to use the word “customer,” knowing that it can be problematic to call students customers.  But, substitute that word for your own preference: student, client, resident, guest, etc. as you see fit.

Kelley splits the ten types into three categories:

     1. The Learning Personas
     2. The Organizing Personas
     3. The Building Personas

There are three types in the Learning Personas category.   The Anthropologist is the keen “eye witness.”  These people innovate by getting a deep understanding of interactions through observation.  The Experimenter is constantly in prototype mode.  These people innovate through “enlightened trial and error.”  The Cross-Pollinator is driven to pull from disconnected sources.  These people innovate by seeing something work in one context and applying it to another.

There are three types in the Organizing Personas category, as well.  The Hurdler is an expert at navigating obstacles.  These people innovate by pushing projects through roadblocks and overcoming bureaucracy.  The Collaborator thrives on bringing people together.  These people innovate by finding synergies and “multidisciplinary solutions.”  The Director also brings people together, but these people innovate by on leading these groups and sparking their talents.

There are four types in the Building Personas category.  The Experience Architect is concerned with creating “deeper” experiences.  These people innovate by looking beyond the basic needs of a customer or functions of a situation to create something special.  The Set Designer focuses on physical environments.  These people innovate through an understanding of how these environments impact behavior and attitude.  The Caregiver is one who provides truly great, personalized service. These people innovate by truly caring about customers and anticipating their needs.  The Storyteller is a developer of compelling narratives.  These people innovate by finding, and helping others find, meaning in the stories embedded in organizational culture and customer experience.

It’s difficult to convey these types in a few short sentences.  But, hopefully this quick overview will help you see that even if you don’t say to yourself, “I am an innovator,” that doesn’t mean you are not contributing to an environment that can be innovative.  Innovation is the application of new ideas and solutions.  But, the source of those can and do come from a variety of perspectives.  So, I encourage you to consider (or reconsider) how you are pushing your office, your field and our profession forward.

After doing the self-assessment that I created with my office, it was enlightening to discuss how we might approach different problems or situations through the different type lenses.  I don’t think that we are all only one type, and I don’t think that was Kelley’s intention.   But, I find it incredibly useful to try to see things with these types’ perspectives.  So, next time you’re in a meeting and find yourself wanting to say “can I play devil’s advocate for a minute.”  Instead say “can I play The Anthropologist for a minute” or “can I play The Set Designer for a minute” and see if you get better results!

Written by Gary Alan Miller

Supporter, thinker, idea generator, project manager. Gary Alan Miller is Senior Assistant Dean with the Academic Advising Program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

  • Tara Morlando Zurlo

    Excellent intro on this topic. I can not wait to read the book referenced here.

    • http://www.garyalanmiller.info garyalanmiller

      I really enjoyed the book, as it goes into much more detail about each type. It inspired me so much that I really did build an assessment tool based on it. I’ve used the assessment at a few conferences. But, I’d really like to start using it with departmental staffs. So, if anyone out there wants me to do that for them, get in touch!

  • http://socialatedu.com/ Kevin Grubb

    Great post, Gary.  I definitely want to check out that book now!  You’re right, it’s hard to tell just from these short descriptions (though you do differentiate them well given that is only one blog entry).  If I had to guess right now, I’d say I fall somewhere into one of these 4 types: Cross-Pollinator, Collaborator, Caregiver, and Storyteller.  But, who knows, I could be all wrong.  I’ll have to read the book to find out.

    • http://www.garyalanmiller.info garyalanmiller

       Thanks, Kevin.  I’m a cross-pollinator who tries hard to be a collaborator. :)

  • T. Kennedy

    I’m going to have to look into the book now.  Is there any chance you’d be willing to share the self-assessment tool?

    • http://www.garyalanmiller.info garyalanmiller

      Hi T. Because I’m using it with consulting work, I can’t really share it without it losing some of that value to me. But, if you get the book, self-identification isn’t difficult. The assessment tool is just a good aid for groups (who wouldn’t all be reading the book).

  • http://twitter.com/coolsosa Sam Sosa-Rodriguez

    Very interesting! Before I finished, I wondered if we were supposed to represent one from each of the three categories listed. Count me in as someone else who’ll be purchasing this book because of your post. Thank you!

    • http://www.garyalanmiller.info garyalanmiller

      My pleasure!

  • Pingback: Iterative, evolutionary and revolutionary innovation ‹ The Student Affairs Collaborative

  • Pingback: Iterative, evolutionary and revolutionary innovations « Service Design, Marketing and Innovation for Higher Ed

  • Pingback: Top 5 Posts : July 2012 ‹ The Student Affairs Collaborative

  • Latest Activity

  • Tags

    #sabest #sachat 9/11 acpa Advice advising career Community Conferences Education and Technology Education Theory engagement facebook Graduate Students higher ed Higher Education how to ideas interviews Job Search leadership leadership development NASPA Orientation Personal Poll professional development reflection residence life social justice Social Media student activities Student Affairs student affairs technology Student Development Student Engagement Student Engagement Theory students Supervision technology This and that Top Content Twitter Uncategorized video
  • Search

  • Archives

  • Categories




Copyright © 2012 Swift Kick