• Home
  • About
  • #SAchat
    • About #SAchat
    • #SAchat Archives
    • #SAchat Awards
  • More
    • Leadership Team
    • Be a Writer
    • SA Directory
  • #SAReads

“We cannot afford mediocre employees”


Posted by Lisa Tetzloff on 09 Feb 2011 / 19 Comments



When I heard a student affairs administrator make this statement awhile back, it gave me pause.

She explained that big budget cuts at her institution a year or so ago meant she had had to find ways to accomplish the university’s mission with fewer staff members. She began the process by assessing employees’ strengths relative to their positions. As a result of her assessment, she kept some employees where they were, she moved a couple to positions she determined to be a better fit for their talents and skills, and she let others go (with several months’ notice and assistance with their job searches).

The competencies she displayed—building and maintaining trust, assessing people and situations well, and making difficult (even painful) decisions without pause—are invaluable.

“Releasing an employee troubles, disturbs, and unsettles every leader,” writes Phillip Clampitt and Robert DeKoch in Transforming Leaders Into Progressmakers: Leadership for the 21st Century (2011, p. 166).

Therefore “cutting your losses [is] . . . an act of judgment and courage,” they concluded.

In higher education, the phrase “cutting your losses” sounds insensitive and incongruent with our culture of learning. Instead, we teach, correct, guide, and motivate . . . sometimes indefinitely. We may convince ourselves that “if only I were a better supervisor, then he/she would be a better employee.” And so we try yet another approach and give the employee more time.

The costs of keeping marginal employees, of course, can be very high. Their actions (or inaction) can affect recruitment and retention of students, the learning environment, risk and liability, and customer service. They also can affect morale, as other employees compensate for deficits or create ways to work around them.

What does it take to be able to handle challenging personnel decisions well? How can we develop these traits and/or skills? What are your thoughts about the statement: “We cannot afford mediocre employees”?

Our students deserve our best, including courageous leadership. How are we building and sustaining our value to our campuses?

Lisa Tetzloff is the Director of the Office of Student Life at the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay.

Written by Lisa Tetzloff


  • Pingback: Tweets that mention “We cannot afford mediocre employees” « The Student Affairs Collaborative -- Topsy.com

  • Pingback: How to Select the Best Philadelphia Bankruptcy Lawyer … | Lawyer Finders

  • http://twitter.com/willistj TJ Willis

    Lisa, thank you for posting this. It is a great reminder that we cannot be mediocre as employees nor tolerate mediocrity as a supervisor. One other cost of not dealing with marginal employees is that they often run off stellar employees. You hit it right on the head stating that it takes a “courageous” leader, but it also takes a strong leader with a bold vision.

    • Lisa Tetzloff

      You're welcome! Thanks for adding to this conversation!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=23302331 Kristin Losey Williams

    This is certainly a hard but true reality to face. Thanks for the post.

  • Tbump

    Wow- another outstanding post Lisa!

    • Lisa Tetzloff

      Thank you!

  • http://blog.swiftkickonline.com tomkrieglstein

    Great post Lisa – outside the institution in the start up world we have a phrase “hire slowly, fire fast” that I think fits well with this post, though the idea of firing someone fast in HigherEd isn't as easy. We also tend to bring new people in as contractors or part time first to see if they are a good cultural fit before we hire full time.

    • Lisa Tetzloff

      Higher ed seems hesitant to learn from “outsiders,” yet there are lessons for us in all kinds of unexpected places. As we reconstruct higher ed, perhaps we could benefit from reframing our thinking in terms of being a “start up.” What would we do if we could start all over again? Thanks, Tom!

      • http://blog.swiftkickonline.com tomkrieglstein

        Whew – you just opened a can of worms :-) It'd be a great post (series of

        post) to talk about HigherEd Thinking Like A Startup.

        • Lisa Tetzloff

          Take it and run! You could do this subject more justice than I could.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Amanda-Anderson/6208339 Amanda Anderson

    Very interesting statement – I agree that we cannot afford mediocre employees but not due to budget cuts – due to the damage that mediocre employees can do to students. I have experienced this during my career and people don't realize how much just not being there affects the students. The very core of what we do has so much to do with presence – something as small as repeatedly missing work or coming to office hours late can have a profound effect on a student who has mustered up the courage to come talk with you.

    In student affairs, yes we are touchy-feely and want to make sure everyone is happy – but at what point do you make that move? I've had the experience of co-workers being consistently mediocre or less and I've seen nothing happen. Now, it's not only affecting the students – it's bringing down the morale of those who are really putting in effort and time.

    • Lisa Tetzloff

      Amanda, thanks for participating in this conversation! What you say here is so important–this is not just an issue for tight budget times.

  • AR0325

    Lisa, you continue to inspire thoughtfulness. No, we cannot afford mediocracy. Period. Our country and the world are in a desperate need of people who will rise above pettiness and individual agendas in order to inspire those around them – regardless of their position in an organizational hierarchy – in order to deliver and live out the mission of an organization, community, etc. We cannot afford mediocracy. The question that's on my mind is: why do we allow for mediocracy to emerge or take foot in our organizations in the first place? Yes, tough decisions are prudent once it takes place. But what do we do to prevent it and create a culture that inspires everything but mediocracy.

  • Anon

    Ha! Take a closer look at your own staff at UWGB

    • Lisa Tetzloff

      Anon, happy to talk with you about this further. Give me a call or send an e-mail.

  • Pingback: The Pause Student

  • http://www.uwgb.edu/retiree/index.html Bob ~ Emeritus

    Yes, Lisa, this is an interesting post for higher education folks. (I retired from UW-Green Bay a few years ago.) But I think the problem exists everywhere, and in every organization. I now work part-time for a for-profit business that struggles with the same problem. In the race for outstanding employees, there's never a finish line.

  • http://higheredcareercoach.com/ Sean Cook

    Great thoughts Lisa. I think it points to several critical institutional needs. First, to train supervisors to be better mentors on the one hand, and more decisive on the other. Bureaucratic policies that drag out the decision-making process are there to protect employees from unfair judgment, but I can attest (from my own experience-i.e., guilt) that it's har

  • Latest Activity

  • Tags

    #sabest #sachat 9/11 acpa Advice advising career Community Conferences Education and Technology Education Theory engagement facebook Graduate Students higher ed Higher Education how to ideas interviews Job Search leadership leadership development NASPA Orientation Personal Poll professional development reflection residence life social justice Social Media student activities Student Affairs student affairs technology Student Development Student Engagement Student Engagement Theory students Supervision technology This and that Top Content Twitter Uncategorized video
  • Search

  • Archives

  • Categories




Copyright © 2012 Swift Kick