• Home
  • About
  • #SAchat
    • About #SAchat
    • #SAchat Archives
    • #SAchat Awards
  • More
    • Leadership Team
    • Be a Writer
    • SA Directory
  • #SAReads

Blog Archives

7 Steps to Awesome: The Tech of a Leadership Conference


Posted by Kevin Prentiss on 19 Jan 2010 / 0 Comment



I promised the good student affairs folk of the Penn State system
that I would write up a draft outline of a tech plan for a state wide
student leadership event. I delayed a bit, so that we could finish up
this new sachat platform – I think it’s an important example of the
goal.

This will be a picture of what is possible, and the benefits,
complete with notes. While I will aim at “reasonable and doable,” the
degree of difficulty will vary by campus. This certainly isn’t THE way
to do this, it is a draft plan to pick apart and play with.

This plan isn’t about just getting something up or what can be done
in an hour, this plan is about creating a cost effective community that
will help your leaders be successful.

Goals:

1) Build a statewide community of student leaders. Use the in person
experience as a catalyst for building an always-available community
online.

Notes: Many leadership conferences focus on skills. “Sit in a
Educational Session and learn what you need to know, then go do it.”
While skills matter, engagement is more important. Community leads to
engagement, conversation, and retention.

Student leaders often face frustration on their own campus. Most of
their peer students just don’t care as much. Giving them easy access to
peer student leaders, who do care as much, will help them maintain
their own motivation while building their skills.

2) Teach and encourage student leaders to share their model of high
education involvement and education via social media and the internet.

Notes: Sharing models of engagement is good for the school (great
content for the web, first year experience, etc.) and for the student -
they have a positive digital identity that will help them find a job.

The Plan and Steps:

1) Use a public collaboration space to plan the events of the conference. I recommend wikispaces.com Start with the free version.

Here’s a great template from an education technology conference happening next weekend.

Notes:

- The point of using a wiki without a password vs. google docs is
that you are modeling for the students how to plan in the open. If they
begin to plan their events on campus in the open, they will, in turn,
be modeling the various stages of involvement for other students around
campus. This is a very good thing.

- Wikis are not magic work solvers. While they do open up the
possibility of community members contributing some effort, don’t count
on it. It will likely be the same 3 people that always to 90% of the
work, plus one surprise over achiever that will come out of no where
and be very helpful.

- Wikis will make it easier for the planning group, and early
interested students, to get on the same page. Compare it to sending
lots of emails, where the information is in small pieces spread
everywhere. Wikis bring it together.

- Click on the “Notify Me” tab on the top of the page to get change
notices to your email. This makes it easy to stay up on things.

2) Set up a Facebook Group (not a fan page), put a link to it on the wiki.

Notes:

- I feel conflicted about this step. Facebook Groups don’t last, as a general rule. Even with student groups, most get set up and forgotten.
The goal here is to establish a longer term platform. If Facebook
groups typically die, does that mean any lines of connection or
artifacts (pictures) burried within the Facebook groups are taking away
from energy that could have gone into something else? I’m not sure.
It’s close, but I think not. I think it’s worth trying both and seeing
where the energy goes. It might just be both. Facebook has changed the
design now, to be more stream oriented, and the message boards now
allow threaded messages and replies in emails. All of this adds up to:
maybe Facebook groups are worth another shot.

- At the very least, it’s worth including in the organization
process to give students a place to post their pictures. Pictures are
one of the most important artifacts of community. Profile pictures,
pictures of fun, pictures of people – it’s one of the best online
reinforcement of feelings that we have.

3) Set up a twitter account specifically for penn state leaders. Something like twitter.com/pennslead

4) Spend 30 minutes learning Mailchimp by watching their howto videos.

Notes:

- Reach out to the attendees as soon as you have a list. Make it a
goal of having a preliminary list as quickly as possible. The first
email should be very short “We’re excited for the conference! Sign up
for the facebook group here or follow us on twitter.”

- If you just want to use Mailchimp for the run up to the
conference, it will be free. If you fall in love and want to use all
the features over a longer period (to send lots of emails), it’s $30 a
month. The tracking alone is worth it.

- Mailchimp will allow you to see who opens the email, and who
clicks on the email. Send a follow up email with a different subject
line within two days to everyone that didn’t open the first email
(Mailchimp makes this easy.)

- Mailchimp will be one of three communication methods you will use.
You will also use Facebook and Twitter (depending on how many students
follow- I would expect 10% or so.) Twitter will get you to the
cellphones if the student wants it, now you have Email, Facebook, and
Text Messaging covered. This makes you awesome.

5) Now look at the students that have joined the Facebook group and
how many have followed on twitter. These are your leaders among
leaders. They are your biggest enthusiasts. Send them a personal email
asking them to get involved in planning the conference. Send them to
the wiki with a specific task and see who follows through.

Notes:

- Again, two things are happening here simultaneously – you are
getting the work done, but you are also teaching. Think of this process
as an ed session in and of itself. If this sounds like a lot of time -
and it’s a couple of hours – ask yourself how much time you would spend
prepping and delivering an ed session for the purposes of educating the
students. Why not teach them online? And doing the work with be
teaching yourself as well.

6) With the help of the students, fingers crossed you’ll find some
techies, build a collaborative place online to put content up from the
conference when it is happening. The goal is to generate a lot of
content at the conference and then keep it going afterwards. Whatever
method you decide on below, you will use the mailchimp interface to
notify students about it before the conference and after the conference.

There are two main options for pulling on the content together in one public place:

A) A posterous blog,
where lots of people can email pictures and words. This creates one
central public blog. Students with smart phones can email pictures
directly from their seats to this blog.

Notes:

- This is the easiest and fastest platform to set up. It has it’s own comment system which works well.

- Every student that emails in content will get posted on the common
group blog as well as creating their own personal blog. Apologies if
this makes your head hurt, it’s an important point.

- Everything the student emails to

B) An aggregated WordPress blog like the new student affairs collaborative platform.

Notes:

- This requires the selection of a common word that students would
attach to their blogs, pictures, or tweets. Use something short and
easy to remember. Best if it is the same as the twitter account. Like
#pennslead

- We went to this system because we wanted to aggregate twitter and
blogs in the same place using one common tag. We wanted student affairs
professionals to have their own blogs where they wrote about what ever
they wanted. When they wanted to add their content to the collaborative
space, they simply add “#sachat” to the blog or tweet and it shows up
on the central blog.

- This system is more flexible and allows participants to use
whatever they are already using (instead of asking everyone to use
posterous.) More flexibility for users requires a little more
investment in the platform. You would hire someone to build this using
Word Press. It’s not a huge expense, but expect about $1000 up front
and $200 a year to keep it going.

- This system would work with whatever blogs your students were
using. So you could encourage them to set up their own blog on penn
state’s system, and then pull together only the content with the tag
#pennslead.

- Notice that this system works. We’ll be posting more on this in
the future, but the student affairs blog is a great and growing
community. It’s a perfect example of exactly what we would want to see
for the student leaders of any state.

7) If you use WordPress, take the RSS feed
and add put it into mail chimp as a RSS -> Email Campaign. You can
set this to go out every Wednesday morning if their is new content on
the central blog. (posterous has it’s own email notification settings
that students will control on their own.)

Notes:

- To build the community, you’ll need both content and notification of the content, until it is a habit. This will take a while.

- Follow up with those students you found in step 5. Ask them to
create content. Tell them they are special (because they are) and you
need their help in creating this place for them to connect and learn
online.

- As staff members, you can keep putting content into the blog and
sending it out. The goal of course, is to transition from staff to
students over time. Keep pushing them, it will happen.

- You will have lots of assessment to show anyone. Mailchimp will
give you open rates and click through. You’ll know traffic to the blog,
new content, and comments. Share these stats with the group to keep
them motivated.

Fire away with comments and questions.

Current Tech Challenges & Creative Solutions: 11/19/09 #SACHAT Recap


Posted by Kevin Prentiss on 20 Nov 2009 / 0 Comment



Last night’s #sachat on Twitter was about current tech challenges and creative solutions in student affairs. In case you missed it, here’s a quick recap:

Full Transcript
View as webpage

Top Contributers
@reyjunco
@debrasanborn
@tomkrieglstein
@cindykane
@ARL275
@gdgrouch27
@jacksonj
@beekayroot
@markgr
@willistj

Questions Needing Answers

  • What PAID tech tools you are using on your campus? (click here to help answer)
  • Does anyone do any kind of online orientation for new students? (click here to  help answer)
  • Does anyone else have difficult implementing new technology because of “old timer” resistance to tech? Strategies for overcoming? (click here to help answer)
  • Anyone using Basecamp to manage group tasks/milestones? (click here to help answer)
  • What is Google Wave and how can it be used in student affairs or FYE? (click here to help answer)
  • What survey systems are/have you used? (click here to help answer)
  • Roll Call: What is your Google Wave account? (click here to help answer)
  • What is GTD and how can it be used in student affairs or FYE? (click here to help answer)

Here’s to another successful #sachat! Due to Thanksgiving next week, the next #sachat won’t be until 12/03/09. We’re also exploring a daytime #sachat, so stay tuned.

Tuesday Tally – How Much Respect Does Your Department Receive From The Administration @ Your Institution?


Posted by Kevin Prentiss on 17 Nov 2009 / 0 Comment



If you cannot view this poll click here.



And here are the results from the last poll.


Playing Catch Up: College and the Web


Posted by Kevin Prentiss on 14 Sep 2009 / 0 Comment




"We shape our tools and then our tools shape us." – Marshall McLuhan

You've probably heard the term "Web 2.0."  The
idea was that the changes in how the internet worked over the last 8
years were profound enough to warrant a whole new version. While the
term has come to embody a whole host of ideas, for our purposes, I'm
going to focus on one main idea: the shift from one to many to many to
many.

At the beginning of the web, pages were
published and static. The web surfer could read or look at multimedia.
The early web was a book, magazine or television experience, delivered
via the computer. There was one publisher and many readers. It was
profound because there could be many publishers which massively
expanded the total content. Soon the content was searchable. It was a
good start.

The expanding "Web 2.0"
insight is that the web, unlike previous mass media, does not have to
be one way communication. The website does not have to just publish, it
can be a conversation. Site visitors can leave comments, upload
pictures, or edit the content on the website, and these new features
provide a mass media experience entirely different than anything that
has come before it.

The idea of allowing
anyone to edit a website, enabled by a simple software tool called
"wiki," lead to the explosive growth of Wikipedia. Turns out thousands
of people around the world wanted to donate their time and expertise to
a repository of human knowledge. Wikipedia was the first to let them. 

We
are social animals, and it didn't take long for this preference to come
to front. Comments were better if we could see the person behind them.
Pictures were more interesting with a little back story. Interacting
with the content of the site quickly became interacting with the people
of the site. "Social networking" sites were the logical extreme of this
shift back to our foundational values.

Sites like Facebook and
Twitter prioritized the human and the social – people came first, with
their individual content second. Neither Facebook nor Twitter have any
of their own content. People do not connect to Twitter, they connect to
other people using Twitter. These sites, and many others, are
successful because they skipped the publishing model entirely and went
right to a connecting and aggregating model. These sites don't produce,
they collect content from the users and manage the delivery of that
content through the network. 

The difference
of these approaches is the difference between an expert publisher, and
an old style telephone operator working the switchboard. Amazingly
enough, it is now the "telephone operator" business models that are
worth billions and the "expert" business models that are in trouble. 

Web 1.0: The "expert" publisher

Web 2.0: The connector and content aggregation

As the competition for
attention heats up, and social sites experience explosive growth, firms
that have a publishing model, like the New York Times, are desperately
trying to figure out how they can make their offering more social. 

To
make a website "social" is to add functionality that allows site
visitors to actively interact with each other, to move from viewer to
participant. Site owners see social features as a way to get users to
stick around longer – because people are more interesting than content.

The desire to add "social" to a core
function of an institution is not new to higher education. Student
Unions were some of the first institutional efforts to make college
more social. Students wanted to connect with each other, and, when it
happened, this connection created belonging, engagement, collaboration,
enhanced learning, and community. Student affairs, through student
activities specifically, has long stressed providing students with
opportunities to interact and socialize.

Based on the incredible investment of universities in social
architecture: in quads, residence halls and lounges, it's ironic that
most universities still do not see the internet as cost effective
social venue, despite the countless examples online.

People want to socialize with their peers, both in person and online.
Facebook's massive growth rate, and continued use, within college
networks proves a
profound need and opportunity was (and is) there. Universities just
couldn't see how to extend the old value and investment into connecting
and learning, to the new field.

It is still a challenge. Universities are following along the same
trends of the internet as a whole, with a bit of a lag. College
websites are still mostly "web 1.0": characterized by static content,
controlled by a centralized office.  Curriculum and learning is still
centralized and controlled in learning managment systems like
Blackboard. Where there are discussion features in Blackboard, the
content stays centralized with the class and is lost at the end of the
term. Where there are blogs on university websites, they tend to be
written by selected and edited "brand ambassadors" – an attempt to put
a real face on a preferred message.

This year, often led by the
admissions department, it has become fashionable for schools to use
social media links on their sites. The thinking, however, is still
mostly in the 1.0 paradigm: "follow the school on twitter" or "become a
fan of the university on Facebook." In this paradigm, the university is
still the focus, a one to many publisher.

Based on competition
and financial pressures, businesses based on publishing models are
scrambling to decentralize, lower cost structures, and move their
models towards connecting and aggregating. When will the paradigm shift
for the University?

When will the goal of university
technology efforts be to connect the students to each other, rather than
connecting the students to the school?

These kind of institutional paradigm shifts – from one to many, to many to many – won't come from just one department. These shifts have to bubble up from many places. Do you think the university can catch up?

Tuesday Tally: How do you spend your summer in Student Affairs?


Posted by Kevin Prentiss on 02 Jun 2009 / 0 Comment



If you cannot view the poll click here.

We're excited to facilitate conversations within the Student Affairs blogging community that really matter to community members. We want to know what you care about, what you think about, and what you want to hear about. With that in mind, please take a minute to complete the following poll so that we can craft our writing to fit what's on your mind.



And here are the results from the last poll.

Tuesday Tally – What are your top 3 problems at work?


Posted by Kevin Prentiss on 12 May 2009 / 0 Comment



If you cannot view the poll click here.

We’re excited to facilitate conversations within the Student Affairs blogging community that really matter to community members. We want to know what you care about, what you think about, and what you want to hear about. With that in mind, please take a minute to complete the following poll so that we can craft our writing to fit what’s on your mind.

Webinar on Teaching Student Leaders to Blog


Posted by Kevin Prentiss on 15 Apr 2009 / 0 Comment



The SA Bloggers and Red Rover are holding another free webinar on Wednesday, May 6th at 1PM (EST).

We're looking for panelists who've
had experience getting their students to blog and welcoming
participants who want to learn about student blogging as a community
building and peer mentoring tool.

Email info@redroverhq.com if you're interested in being a panelist or register as a participant at http://redrover2.eventbrite.com/.

To view or suggest future webinars and see resources from past webinars visit http://thesabloggers.swiftkick.wikispaces.net/Webinar+Schedule

Facebook and Orientation Webinar Recap and Links


Posted by Kevin Prentiss on 08 Apr 2009 / 0 Comment



We had a very successful live webinar panel on “Facebook and Orientation” yesterday afternoon. We maxed out the available slots with almost 50 schools in attendance.

Thank you again to our wonderful panelists:

Debra Sanborn, Iowa State University (find her on twitter: @debrasanborn)

Dr. Jennifer Sherry, VCU School of Education

Beth Oakley, University of Windsor

This webinar was intended as an experiment in live, distance, collaborative learning for student affairs. The feedback from the participants and the panelists was enthusiastic. We’ll definitely be doing more.

Unfortunately, however, we learned (the hard way) one limitation of our webinar software: it does not record the conference call on the VoIP bridge.

This means that I won’t be able to post the recording of the webinar as I had hoped. My apologies to everyone for this. We will figure out a work around next time to make sure that the information is captured and shared.

I can, however, share some interesting tidbits from the seminar, and Debra will be doing her own recap shortly.

We ran a quick poll of the attendees on the wiki page for the seminar, and here were the results (26 respondents):

1. Do you have a personal Facebook account?

Yep 96.00%
Nope 4.00%

2. Did you officially start your class of 2013 Facebook group?

No 88.46%
Not Sure 7.69%
Yes 3.85%

3. If you didn’t start your 2013 Facebook group, are you in contact with the person who did?

No 64.00%
Yes 16.00%
Not Sure 16.00%
I started the group 4.00%

4. Would you accept a Facebook friend request from a student?

Yep 50.00%
Undecided 26.92%
Nope 23.08%

So, if you haven’t yet, reach out to your 2013 group leaders!

As always, there was some discussion about appropriateness of friending students and the challenges of blending the social and academic context. I’m looking forward to continuing the conversation around these topics.

Here are few follow up resources:

Dr. Sherry participated in a podcast on using Facebook in education. It’s available here.

Faculty on Facebook: Confirm or Deny? available here.

The main Facebook page of VCU school of education is here.

Here are my slides from the APCA National Conference. The first half is Orientation and Facebook, the second half is an overview of the Red Rover pilot program of last fall. (I did not present during the webinar.)

More resources are coming in now. I’ll post them up here as I receive them.

Facebook and Orientation, Things to Consider


Posted by Kevin Prentiss on 06 Apr 2009 / 0 Comment



In the spirit of sharing information as widely as possible (just like this blog!) here is a 25 minute video from the recent APCA National conference. The session was about Facebook, Orientation, and reviewing opportunities to help the students.


Facebook and Orientaiton Ed Session at APCA Nationals 2009 from Red Rover on Vimeo.

If you are interested in the subject, please join us for a free webinar tomorrow (Tuesday, April 7th). You can register for the event by clicking here.

I will be moderating the panel, and we will hear from:

Beth Oakley, M.Ed. | Director, Educational Development Centre | University of Windsor
Creating your college’s entering class Facebook group.

Jennifer Sherry, Ph.D. |Secondary Advisor and Recruitment Coordinator | Virginia Commonwealth University
Communicating campus culture, events, and key information using Facebook.

Debra Sanborn, M.A. | Director, Hixson Opportunity Awards | Iowa State University
Increasing engagement by creating targeted groups.

Come join us!

Disrupting Class and Student Affairs


Posted by Kevin Prentiss on 06 Oct 2008 / 0 Comment



I just finished Disrupting Class, by Clayton Christensen, et. al. It’s a terrifically interesting book for anyone interested in education.

Christensen is an expert in innovation. In the book, he brings his concise, clear, highly useful frames for thinking about improvement and change over to education.

Of particular interest to Student Affairs, I believe, is the historical narrative listing the changing goals of education.

A quick summary:

Job 1: 1830′s – Horace Mann lead a charge to formalize schooling around a Jeffersonian goal: educate students to be citizens in a democracy. Only elite students went on past grade school.

Job 2: 1890′s – Provide something for every student. Prepare them for a variety of jobs so that everyone can be employed. This required high school, and diverse offerings in high school. In 1905 only a third of students made it to high school and only a third graduated. Even fewer made it to college. By 1935 75 percent were entering high school and almost 45 percent were graduating. Both breadth and depth of services exploded. With 1954′s Brown vs. Board of education high schools opened wide to all of society. While the number of high schools in 1930 to 1970 stayed about the same at 24,000, the average number of students per high school exploded tenfold from around a 100 to over 1000 by 1970. The larger high schools had an unheard of variety of programs with a growing number of student support services. By 1960, 69 percent of high schoolers were graduating- an impressive record of success.

Job 3: 1960′s – Keep America competitive. Sony, Canon, and Toyota all started to displace their American competition. Policy makers drew a correlation between performance of American students vs. their foreign peers. Standardized tests were the metric, education, again, was the solution. In the influential 1983 report “A Nation at Risk“, the federal government questioned the breadth of services, suggesting it muddied the focus on the more important core competencies. It said “students have too many choices”. In short, the goal post had moved. What was good – more offerings to prepare everyone – was now bad.

Job 4: 2001 – Eliminate Poverty. the No Child Left Behind act changed the goal from bringing up the average standardized test score to bringing the highest number possible up to proficiency. It’s a subtle, but important shift in the value system.

Christensen sums it up:

“Society has hired education to do four distinct jobs.”

Impressively, education as a whole has shown steady improvement towards each goal as it has been defined. The very difficult challenge is simply that the goals keep changing.

Now education is “in a crisis” not because it’s doing a bad job per se, but because it is being measured by different people with different, and shifting, value systems.

It does not make sense to blame administrators and teachers for falling short on the new metric of success. Any judgement of success must be placed in context. An important part of that context is clarity on what the current goal is and what metrics go with that goal.

The Student Affairs professionals in my circle often talk about “taking it all on” and constantly struggling to complete assessment that is both actionable and in line with the value systems of the school and their supervisors.

Do you feel like your job goals have changed during your tenure? Are you clear on the big picture? Is your supervisor and school on the same page?

In the same book, Christensen offers a great frame for addressing disconnects – but that’s another post.

123456
  • Latest Activity

  • Tags

    #sabest #sachat 9/11 acpa Advice advising career Community Conferences Education and Technology Education Theory engagement facebook Graduate Students higher ed Higher Education how to ideas interviews Job Search leadership leadership development NASPA Orientation Personal Poll professional development reflection residence life social justice Social Media student activities Student Affairs student affairs technology Student Development Student Engagement Student Engagement Theory students Supervision technology This and that Top Content Twitter Uncategorized video
  • Search

  • Archives

  • Categories




Copyright © 2012 Swift Kick