Facilitating Discussion on Campus

Free speech in the United States is defined by the Bill of Rights – the First Amendment to be exact.  In case you need to see it again, here it is: 

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

One of the only circumstances that abridges this freedom of speech is yelling fire in a crowded theatre. 

Free speech is not as clear on a college campus.  There are multiple court cases that I will spare discussion of in this venue, but colleges in general are not protected by the same free speech rights as everywhere else.  Most colleges try to maintain some sort of open forum in the name of fostering academic discussion and student development.

I bring this up because free speech has been a particularly volatile discussion on our campus this year.  The first incident occurred in our "Free Expression Tunnel".  The tunnel was created as a Public Works project in 1939 as part of FDR's new deal programs; it was opened to Free Expression in the 1960s as a response to graffiti around campus related to the Vietnam War.  Over the years it has evolved into a BillBoard for all manner of writing including being painted by rival schools (video). 
The problem arose when the night after the election of President Obama. Several students painted messages using offensive language and mentioning that someone should assassinate the president.  Many students were upset when these images were found the next morning.  The Secret Service was called to investigate the threat, per the law, and the images were quickly painted over.

Among the student affairs folks, an intense discussion began about how to handle this incident.  Some wanted to make an example of the students, some wanted to brick up the tunnel to avoid any future painting, and some wanted to use it as a teachable moment.  I'll be honest, I don't know that there is a consensus to this day on what course of action should have been taken.  The students were disciplined internally, the images were painted over, and a series of discussions were held to promote campus healing.

The second incident I wanted to talk about was something that connected with me personally.  I work with our campus activities board doing programming and for our last event of the year, the committee I work with will have a comedian who describes himself as an "equal opportunity offender".  I have been told that certain people will be there to "monitor" the event in case there are offensive things being said; I'm not sure what their course of action will be if there is something offensive (there will be).

I found these events both interesting because I think they go back to a central question…how do we deal with free speech on campus?  As student affairs folks, I think we all want people to enjoy their college experience, persist and graduate, and hopefully learn something while they're here.  

I think I could nitpick some of the approaches I've seen, but I don't think it is our charge as student affairs folks to control the speech on campus.  I think it is our charge to challenge and support our students in all things and to do everything we can to foster their learning and their retention.  We should be the ones helping to foster the discussion and hope that our students learn how to deal with people saying offensive things rather than to try and stifle free speech.  

One of the approaches that I loved came from one of our campus professionals.  He suggested we tell our students to stand up when they think something is offensive and to speak out – be the one who's not afraid to paint over speech in the Free Expression Tunnel.  Through doing this, we're educating our students about the right of free speech – people have the right to say offensive things, but we also have the right to speak up and say the right things.  Hopefully, this approach will foster student learning and build the campus community that we all would like to have.
  • Tom,
    Great question. We didn't give a structured way for people to have an equal platform. We just encouraged those students who were offended or thought the speech inappropriate to share practice their 1st amendment right as well. In this situation, the Free Expression Tunnel was painted with messages that countered the messages of those few over the next few days. Here's an article from our student publication on how this issue turned out..
    http://technicianonline.com/2.4106/1.1569660
  • Hey Jeff,
    First off, kudos on a great first post on the site!
    Secondly, Sean makes a lot of points that I agree with and want to back up.
    Blocking the tunnel just intensifies the issue. Sean's example of the artist is a great way to facilitate a teachable moment.
    I think it's perfectly ok for your office to not fully agree on an action. I think that's the nature of free speech. So often we want to box it in, but any time we do it kicks us back. Maybe free speech is meant to be perpetually debated even if it is a drain on our resources.
    Also, I'm confused about the solution of giving the other side an equal platform to speak up against the negativity. I think it's a lot easier said than done to stand up against the hate, even though it's important to. I also fear that free speech would then turn into a yelling make with everyone talking and no one listening. Thoughts?
  • Sean Cook
    I had the opportunity to do a cultural lounge program once featuring a photographer who took pictures of the ongoing conversations in a graffiti tunnel like this at Penn State. The photos were displayed in one building in a public space and an employee complained about the subject matter. The university moved the exhibit to a cultural lounge in my area, which at the time was kept locked unless reserved. A censorship controversy ensued. I invited the photographer to come do a "Gallery Talk" and discuss the controversy around his exhibit. We then had a reception afterward. Since then, we have done many "gallery talks" for artists featured in our exhibit space. Times like these call for conversations and we should be facilitating them. Punishment for offenders and closing off the tunnel wouldn't address the real problems or provide a teachable moment. When controversies like this arise, some do whatever they can to make the problem and the bad feelings go away, rather than addressing them head-on. I think students get surprised when you allow the conversation to play itself out, so whenever possible, I lean toward that. The conversations will result in growth. Closing the tunnel might have appeased some, but it would have been the equivalent of closing off the conversation. The underlying problem would still exist, and those who needed to talk it through would only be frustrated further. It sounds like the solution in this case kept the conversations going and placed responsibility on students to be a part of the solution. A great example of how controversy on campus should be handled.
  • Just as our American culture and political climate changes so does the degree of freedom associated with public speech. Each generation finds themselves facing the challenges of reconciling their concept of freedom of speech with the prevailing powers that be. It is very heartening, at least to those that feel freedom of speech should err on the side of less instead of more restrictions, to see that you have exercised your rights in this forum and in such a conscientious and open manner.
blog comments powered by Disqus
  • Tags

    Tips ideas faculty facebook #saplacement Graduate Students Advice professional development YouTube Poll candidates acpa leadership development leadership #sachat assignments student activities Job Search NACADA Tech Social Media Twitter The Placement Experience academic advising Placement how to video nacada RSS Student Affairs career technology Orientation interviews NASPA This and that Best Practices students blogging life purpose social justice Conferences Higher Education student affairs technology engagement administration